--- In fast5@yahoogroups.com, "RickS" <rstewart@...> wrote:
>
> Both diets help you to lose weight and are based on intermittent fasting. Not sound entirely surly, but there's no charge for Fast-5. Honestly, every now and then due to familial obligations, I will eat like a 'normal' person for a day and then eat nothing the next. Then I go right back to Fast-5. I've tried both ways and I've found that the reason fast-5 works for me is that I like schedules. I can't trust myself to sometimes eat and sometimes not eat. As Heather mentioned, I like looking forward to my awesome meal at the end of the day. I like thinking about what will make the most delicious meal for my body and mood for that day.
>
> It really is a personal choice. Either way will work FAR better than the standard american diet so you just have to choose which way will make you happy for the rest of your life. Or use both, but do it for the rest of your life.
>
> -Rick5
I've gotten very used to the eating a meal every day Fast-five type of eating as I have often eaten this way in the past before I started following set Fast-5 schedule over the past year. Reading about Alternate Day Fasting, it appears that research has shown benefits of this form of alternate day fasting. Dr. Johnson is the one most documented. I was curious if any Fast-fivers had tried alternate day fasting and believe the so-called benefits of SIRT1.
http://www.johnsonupdaydowndaydiet.com/html/diet-why-it-works.html
I decided to give Alternate day eating a try this week and right away found that it is not as pleasant as fast 5 when at the end of the day I'm ready for my usual daily meal. I can make it to 24 hours straight of fasting, but yesterday evening decided to eat around 700 calories instead of waiting overnight to the alternate day, 36 hours of fasting. I had completely fasted on fast day like I do during the fast-5 period, not eating 500 calories throughout "fast" day like Dr. Johnson or Warrior diets document. From my fast 5 reading I assumed that complete fasting was necessary during the fasting period so had in the past sloughed off these other styles of fasting which included a bit of calories during a "fast" period. Now, I'm starting to question if fast-five is really the best way.
I suspect like you said, it's simply another way of fasting and probably all methods of fasting show similar benefits...so might try different styles of fasting to "spice it up". I was simply curious about that SIRT1 gene thingy. ;-) Wouldn't be surprised if Fast-five does the same thing.
http://www.johnsonupdaydowndaydiet.com/html/diet-why-it-works.html
Barnaby
> --- In fast5@yahoogroups.com, "barnabywalker" <barnabywalker@> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I had assumed because I get nearly a 20 hour period of fasting every 24 hours that Fast 5 would be the most efficient form of fasting for fat loss.
> >
> > Starting to question how this compares to Every Other Day 24 hour fasts with regular 3 meals/day on the alternate Non-fast day. Eat Stop Eat has a similar 2 or 3 24 hour fast days per week, then regular multiple meals on the eating days
> >
> > Could it be true that fasting every single day for 19 hours is defeating our purpose with Fast 5 and we would be better to Alternate days of 24 hour Fasting? Been reading about some type of change in the body to activate a gene called SIRT-1 with the every other day fasting?
> >
> > Barnaby
> >
>
------------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fast5/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fast5/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
fast5-digest@yahoogroups.com
fast5-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
fast5-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[get this widget]
0 comments:
Post a Comment