Several doctors have been after me to take statins or , in the case of an alternative doctor, red rice yeast and niacin, to lower my cholesterol. This has been going on for a number of years now. I think the whole cholesterol thing is fear mongering and statin pushing is all wrong. The only cholesterol number that seems to truly indicate any real danger is the small dense LDL. But I always had low triglycerides and high HDL . I had read that *indicated* that my high LDL was predominantly the large puffy kind. In October 0f 07 my LDL, as part of the regular panel,i.e., not measured, was 228. In Feb of 2008 after being on Fast -5 for 6 months it was 154. then I went off Fast-5, but stayed low carb, and by December it was 210
I decided to go back on Fast-5, and this time measure the LDL directly because that is the only way to really know if it is large or small.
In December, on a low carb diet, small particle was 716. In April, having been back on a low carb version of Fast-5 it was 314. The test was an NMR. The reference range for optimal LDL is below 600.
In October of 07 my LDL, as part of the regular panel,i.e., not measured, was 228
In Feb of 2008 after being on Fast -5 for 6 months it was 154. then I went off Fast-5, but stayed low carb, and by December it was 210.
All this time I have eaten lots of saturated fat, by the way.
Ellen
Thursday, May 7, 2009
[fast5] Reduction in Small LDL on Fast-5
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
__,_._,___
[get this widget]
Posted by Stuart Hurley at 6:49 AM
0 comments:
Post a Comment